Valley Residents Live Longer, But Not Better
Report says Lehigh, Northampton counties fare worse than most in state on quality of life indicators.
Lehigh Valley residents live longer than most Pennsylvanians but have a poorer quality of life, according to new health rankings.
Out of Pennsylvania’s 67 counties, Northampton County ranks 60th for residents’ morbidity – which takes into account such problems as days of feeling mentally or physically ill and incidence of low birth weight babies. Lehigh County fared better but still dropped from 32nd to 37th in morbidity this year.
That’s according to a report by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, which compile the county health rankings each year. A breakdown of the two counties’ rankings can be viewed here for Northampton County and here for Lehigh County.
Public health advocates say such results point to the need for a bi-county health department.
“Those are measures of how healthy we are as a region,” said Steven Bliss, executive director of Renew Lehigh Valley, which works toward regionalization. “They make an ironclad case for why we need to do better on prevention, population health and environmental health, which would be exactly the focus of a regional public health department.”
A public health agency would be charged with conducting restaurant and child care center inspections, running vaccine clinics, tracking communicable diseases and food borne illnesses, working with pregnant women who might be at risk of having low birth-weight babies, among other tasks.
In Jan., Northampton County Council members voted to prohibit the Lehigh Valley Board of Health from using a private foundation grant to work toward creating a bi-county health department. But the volunteer health board is continuing to meet to craft a strategy for gaining support for such an agency. Health department opponents argue that the board has yet to show linkage between the work of a public health department and better health outcomes for the population.
In the 2011 county health rankings, Lehigh and Northampton counties fared better on the report’s rankings for mortality, which looks at length of life. Lehigh County ranked 21st out of 67 counties and Northampton came in ninth. Bliss suggested that the number of top-notch hospitals in the Valley is largely responsible for the counties having fewer premature deaths than in most of the state. “That’s a reflection of how good is your health system,” he said. “How well we do keeping people alive if they have a disease.”
On some health factors Valley residents fell near the state average. About 27 percent of Lehigh County adults and 29 percent of Northampton County adults are obese, compared with 28 percent of adult Pennsylvanians as a whole. Twenty-four percent of Lehigh County adults and 17 percent of Northampton County’s adults smoke, compared to 22 percent statewide, according to the report.
Lehigh County had a high rate of the sexually transmitted disease Chlamydia with 384 cases per 100,000 people. Northampton County only had 189; the state average was 340.
Lehigh County also had a higher teen birth rate of 38 births per every 1,000 young women ages 15-19. In Northampton County, that number was 24; the state average was 31.
Ilene Prokup, chairwoman of the Lehigh Valley Board of Health, said Thursday that she had not yet seen the county rankings report and so couldn’t comment on specifics. But she said public health departments work to educate the public on issues – such as obesity – that affect quality of life. Obese people are more at risk of Type 2 diabetes, which can lead to disabilities that keep adults from going to work and children from going to school, she said. That affects their quality of life and their ability to be productive citizens.
Bliss agreed. “It’s really a pay now and pay later sort of thing,” he said. “You pay up front for prevention or you pay down the road” for treatment and hospitalization.
Robert Lynch
9:38 am on Sunday, April 3, 2011
So Northampton County ranks 60th in mobididy. So lets say we create a multi million dollar agency to improve this number to say 30th. What happens then is another county becomes 60th and will also need an agency. This continues until all counties have this and guess what? Some county is STILL going to be 60th. What does it all prove?
Sheryl.
11:19 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011
Any information on cancers in the area? Our area had a big push about 15 yrs. ago to stop the cement mills from burning waste products that are not typically thought of as a fuel source. I've been told that the EPA can not police what is burned in those mills. Sounds quite ridiculous. Who can? Even though many cancers are not the exact similar type, and can not be classified a cluster, there is, however , an alarmingly high incidence of cancer in the area. Asthma, too, and all of the other respiratory illnesses seem to be way above the normal level. So, clean air and water should be a priority. Prevention at the most basic level.
Margie Peterson
10:13 am on Monday, April 4, 2011
Sheryl, if you click on the link in the story to the report findings on Northampton County, you'll see how the county fared on unhealthy air pollution days but I did not see specific details on cancers.
Robert, I guess you could argue that some counties have to be near the bottom so why shouldn't Northampton be one of them. But the public health advocates would argue that a public health agency will improve the population's health and quality of life and save money in the long run with fewer employees calling out sick, fewer low birthweight babies who need extensive medical care etc. You can contact Renew Lehigh Valley (linked in story) if want to hear more on why they think it will be cost effective.
Wayne Schissler
9:18 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011
If you want to talk about cost effectiveness you need to compare Lehigh and Northampton counties to counties that already have a health board. I know Erie county has a board that employs over 70 full time workers (Jan 14th, 2011 Erie Times-News) - go and use the compare feature on the countyhealthrankings.org site. Erie loses in most categories despite the fact that they have fewer air pollution days. I know there's a lot of other variables to consider but I think it's irresponsible to infer, as the article or director seems to do, that the ranking in one category is an "ironclad case" for a health board.